This is topic Demolition Man in forum General Sci-Fi at Flare Sci-Fi Forums.


To visit this topic, use this URL:
https://flare.solareclipse.net/ultimatebb.php/topic/8/1113.html

Posted by Daniel Butler (Member # 1689) on :
 
I watched Demolition Man for the first time in several years last night. I did a search on here and didn't see anything more than a few passing mentions, so I thought I'd start a thread...

I think this movie is greatly underrated. It does have some really bad elements, but the potential for a great story is there. And gotta love Sandra Bullock at that age...

Firstly, this movie came out in 93; did people really expect synaptic behavior modification, cryogenic suspension, and the total degradation of LA into a war-torn wasteland by 1996? I was only a wee bairn in 93, but I don't really remember that kind of incredible expectation.

Also, wouldn't those synaptic devices freeze with the rest of you? And how is it re-forming your synapses while you're frozen solid? And if you're not frozen solid then why don't you age (not to mention how do you breathe or feed...)?

I also think it'd take more than 40 years to turn LA into that kind of dystopia - and where is the rest of the country during all of this? The US just let LA, San Andreas, and the third city I always forget secede? And why do the scraps live in the sewers instead of just moving out of the city?

I also wonder why there'd be a museum of violence and firearms in a society where people are absolutely horrified by the very suggestion of disorder and violence. Why would anyone wish to visit the place?

On the upside, the ubiquitous computing, RFID chips in the hands, and the way the SAPD was tied into absolutely everything via their AI was pretty bang-on as far as I'm concerned. The first two are well on their way, and the third is completely logical. In fact I loved watching the computer alert the officers to the two dead guards, showing a 3D map and then jumping to the live warden, describing his injuries. ("Do you wish to assign a coroner?")

So it does have its logical plotholes, but I think its description of the future is very logical (even the dystopian elements - omniscient authorities and behavior modification might not be too far off in some parts of the world...).

Thoughts? Flames? Groans?
 
Posted by Jeff Raven (Member # 20) on :
 
He still didn't figure out the seashells.
 
Posted by Reverend (Member # 335) on :
 
Well those elements you mentioned were by no means new and original when this film came out. It has elements of Logans Run, THX1138, Brave New World, 1984 and a bunch of other stuff that's been knocking around for ages.

That said it's still a fun film and a favourite of mine when I was in school, though mostly because of Wesley Snipes, who completely stole the show right from under Stallone's nose. So did Nigel Hawthorne.

I've actually been waiting for a decent DVD release to come out for this film for ages as the current one is very bare bones and I've always suspected there was quite a bit cut out of the film. Nothing specific but there are a few edits that seam abrupt and jumps around a bit, as if a bunch of connected scenes were cut in half and re-assembled for time.
 
Posted by B.J. (Member # 858) on :
 
San Angeles. I think it was supposed to be a merging of the two cities.

The whole fast food war was a bit out there, with TACO BELL of all places winning, and becoming the upscale posh place to eat!?

They really needed to place the beginning a little further in the future to be believable, what with all that cryo/re-education stuff.

I was with Stallone's character on one point - that VR stuff was just freaky.
 
Posted by Peregrinus (Member # 504) on :
 
The Schwarzeneggar Presidential Library was right there in my mind when Arnie was elected California's Governor. [Smile]

--Jonah
 
Posted by Daniel Butler (Member # 1689) on :
 
Yeah! I heard her mention that and I was like zomg, cuz that could happen and they had no idea ;P I remember when Arnie announced his candidacy on Leno, and there was an echo of that line from D-Man in my head, but I couldn't place it at the time. I just remember saying to my friend, "It's like a joke in a scifi where someone goes to the future and finds out Schwarzenegger was president or something..."

And you know, I'm woeeeefully under...watcher...ed when it comes to scifi movies made before about 1998. Never seen Logan's Run, 1984 (loved the book though), Brave New World (ditto), The Day the Earth Stood Still, or any of those classics. So excuse my ignorance, a bit. [Smile]

And about San Angeles, it was the merging of three cities, I thought... LA, San Something, and another San Something...
 
Posted by Reverend (Member # 335) on :
 
I think San Angeles was called "Los Angeles - San Diego - Santa Barbara Metroplex"?
I think I read somewhere they got the name from a early draft of Bladerunner, which would make sense as the opening shot of Demolition Man is a clear homage to BR.
 
Posted by Sol System (Member # 30) on :
 
There is no filmed version of 1984 that is a classic. Or Brave New World either.
 
Posted by Daniel Butler (Member # 1689) on :
 
Might explain why I haven't seen them.
 
Posted by Masao (Member # 232) on :
 
The John Hurt version of 1984 is pretty good.

On Japanese videotapes Taco Bell wasn't Taco Bell. The megacorp was changed to Pizza Hut, since there aren't any Taco Bells in Japan. I suspect that in other regions the restaurant was also changed.
 
Posted by Saltah'na (Member # 33) on :
 
McDonalds in some. Burger King in others.
 
Posted by Reverend (Member # 335) on :
 
It was Taco Bell in the UK. Though we don't have any that I'm aware of. Perhaps Brits are more psycologically prepared to deal with references that we don't get.

And the 1984 version of 1984 was definitive.
Logan's Run was just camp silliness with a bunch of amoral hippies looking like twats running around in jumpsuits. Still a classic though.
Brave New World on the other hand just freaked me out, what with the little green children and the Shakespeare quoting loon.
 
Posted by B.J. (Member # 858) on :
 
quote:
Originally posted by Masao:
On Japanese videotapes Taco Bell wasn't Taco Bell. The megacorp was changed to Pizza Hut, since there aren't any Taco Bells in Japan. I suspect that in other regions the restaurant was also changed.

quote:
Originally posted by Saltah'na:
McDonalds in some. Burger King in others.

I'm not sure how that would work. Didn't they actually show them eating tacos, complete with Taco Bell wrappers? Not to mention the external shots of the restaurant.
 
Posted by Mark Nguyen (Member # 469) on :
 
1) You never know - since Taco Bell isn't in Japan, they may be able to read the English text but wouldn't be able to understand what a "taa-ko beh-ruu" is in their language. Or, they could simply have changed the sign and done another take with the table.

2) Logan's Run had some of the coolest gun effects ever.

3) Apparently according to Sly himself, THIS is how you use the three seashells.

Mark
 
Posted by Josh (Member # 1884) on :
 
Who wants to go to the beach and test that out?
 
Posted by Daniel Butler (Member # 1689) on :
 
They didn't eat tacos with wrappers as I remember. They ate little silver platters of nacholike things.
 
Posted by Masao (Member # 232) on :
 
Japanese know what tacos and bells are and can usually read the roman alphabet, but I doubt they would know what type of bell a "taco bell" would be. (Evidently, "Bell" was the name of the founder). Both Taco Bell and Pizza Hut are owned by the same company, so the change in the movie was pretty easy.

English words on signs and such are usually transliterated into katakana in the subtitles.
Tacos and nachos are about the only Mexican food widely known in Japan. I've seen instances in movies when "enchilada" and "burrito" were translated as "taco."
 
Posted by Mars Needs Women (Member # 1505) on :
 
I remember seeing this movie in the theaters. I must have been 4 or 5 years old but I do remember Wesley Sniped acting really crazy and evil. It's was one of those dumb action movies that you really enjoy for the over-the-topness than the actual plot.
 
Posted by Timo (Member # 245) on :
 
Pizza Hut here in Finland.

The only Tex-Mex food 90% of this audience would have heard of was beans. Tex-Mex didn't become popular until a bit later. And not popular enough to support fast food chains.

And I enjoyed the movie chiefly for the comeuppance delivered Sir Humphrey Appleby.

Timo Saloniemi
 
Posted by Lee (Member # 393) on :
 
There was at least one Taco Bell in the UK, in London, just between Leicester Square and Piccadily, circa 1990. It's now a TGI Friday's. I ate there a couple of times when I lived nearby, food seemed weird and not very nice.
 
Posted by Bones McCoy (Member # 1480) on :
 
In South Africa it was Pizza hut too... with a really bad dub. I always wondered why. I'm sure the majority of people would have gotten it, regardless of the popularity of Mexican food in the various regions. But what the hell do I care...?
 
Posted by Hobbes (Member # 138) on :
 
All restaurants being Taco Bell never made much sense... besides, Del Taco is much better.

I always wondered about the rest of the country in this movie though. Was the entire state and country just like the city? Fines of cussing... radio stations only playing old commercial jingles, etc. Hell, I'd be living in the sewer too if caffeine and alcohol were made illegal.
 


© 1999-2024 Charles Capps

Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3