Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Community
»
The Flameboard
»
Omega's Questions
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Omega: [QB] JK: "The Florida legislature? Aren't they trying to bypass the voters?" No. The Florida legislature is only intending to be prepared in the event that a judge in FL decides to disregard the law and override the certification. If there is not a certified slate of electors by December 12, the legislature is allowed and REQUIRED to name a slate for the state. They also intend to send a message to the activist FL S.C. In no way are they trying to override the voters, nor could they. re: 'Fairness Doctrine' "I wasn't aware the support of a person's free speech was un-constitutional." Do you believe that the right to speak automatically converys a right to be heard, in any medium desired, even those privately owned? If so, how does this apply to the property rights of the owner of the press or broadcast tower? Further, how does this apply to the freedom of expression of the publisher of the paper? "[i][Editorials] are instituted voluntarily. I asked your opinion on forced equivilants[/i] Yeah, you're right, we shouldn't use force to ensure someone's Constitutional rights. We should just let them be trampled on (sigh)." Do you believe that the right to speak automatically converys a right to be heard, in any medium desired, even those privately owned? If so, how does this apply to the property rights of the owner of the press or broadcast tower? Further, how does this apply to the freedom of expression of the publisher of the paper? "When *exactly* has the Democratic Party tried to ban firearms?" They have not, nor did I say they have. I said they support the idea. A north-eastern state governor said that his objective was to rid the state of handguns. He was a democrat. The Democrats constantly attempt to make it harder for law-abiding citizens to obtain guns, regardless of the fact that this has been statistically shown to increase crime. What other conclusion can you draw from these facts? "The seperation of church and state is consitutional, Omega." No, it is not. "Congress shall make no law regarding an establishment of religion..." does not imply a seperation of church and state. It simply states that the federal government can not establish a national religion. This does not apply to a school district in any way. There IS NO seperation of church and state, in the popular meaning. re: Clinton He commited a crime. He should have been tried and removed. The DNP said that neither was nesecary, when the Constitution clearly states that it is. "How is the FCC illegal?" It restricts the use of private property beyond preventing harm to others. It is thus unconstitutional. Your remianing responses are non-points. "[i]Do you believe that peaceful protest constituts a right to kill two thousand people?[/i] Well, I didn't say that, now did I?" No, nor did I say you did. Please answer the question. "Why do you believe Al Gore, if elected, will attempt to ban firearms even though there is no evidence of this?" I have never stated that I believe this. Your question is moot. "[i]Why do you believe that these GOP politicians have lied even though you have no evidence of this?[/i]" You did not answer this question. "[i]how is timing relevent [to the comission of attrocities by a government]?[/i] Er ... then you can't really say that what we did to the Indians is "all in the past", now can you?" Yes, as this is a different administration. The people in the administration that hurt the natives are all dead. The people that killed 2,000 peaceful protesters in China are still in power. The circumstances are non-analogous. "[i]What if one [Siamese twin] decided to commit suicide, an act which would nearly inevitably lead to the death of the other? How would your beliefs regarding one's right to one's body apply in this situation? Your response was not an answer to my question?[/i] No, it wasn't an answer to your question, but its the most you're going to get. I'm not in that position, Omega. I can't judge." You have beliefs on what is right and wrong. How would they apply to the situation described? Is the outcome of such application acceptable to you? Tahna: "If you believe that Republicans never lie, then I don't know what kind of world you are talking about." I do not believe this. I simply asked whether you could demonstrate a time in which a GOP, say, presidential cantidate has lied to the people. "If a Republican does happen to lie under oath in the same degree as Clinton, I don't think you'll be saying the same thing anymore." No, I wouldn't. I'd be calling for his head. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3