Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Community
»
The Flameboard
»
We didn't bankroll Bin Laden after all!
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Malnurtured Snay: [QB] [QUOTE]We're doing more than we have to do, therefore we're doing enough.[/QUOTE] That's rather ... interesting logic. [QUOTE]and it may make our touchy-feely left wing more amenable to carrying out the necessities of the war, but other than that it serves no useful purpose[/QUOTE] Not to mention giving you and Bush and who knows who else the ability to say: "Look! We're feeding the Afghanis! Aren't we kind? Why are you asking if we're doing enough? Questioning authority now is treason. Fuck off." [QUOTE]I only ignore other people saying that to me, because I've already covered it.[/QUOTE] T.E. wasn't commenting to anyone in particular, he was simply stating his views. [QUOTE]You're assuming that the 'food packs' only feed one person one meal. Is that true?[/QUOTE] My math is based on [i]one[/i] per person per day. Otherwise feeding 1 million Afghanis per day would jump to $180 million dollars. [QUOTE]Your attempted rebuttal of my analogy makes zero sense, since I cast you in the part of the World Trade Center, and I know damned sure the CIA (Fat Tony) didn't want the WTC destroyed. Talk about not reading stuff...[/QUOTE] Then your analogy makes no sense at all. Perhaps is Fat Tony (the U.S.) gave you (Pakistan) the money to fund an operation in Baltimore and you funded Omega (Mujhardeen), who later turned around and shot Fat Tony's Lieutenant (WTC). [QUOTE]Don't flatter yourself.[/QUOTE] And yet you just devoted a whole paragraph to me. Thanks <img src="smile.gif" border="0" alt="" /> [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3