Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Community
»
The Flameboard
»
War crimes court?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by First of Two: [QB] Tattoos don't KILL anyone! (unless they get infected, in which case they only kill the tattooed) [QUOTE] they have absolutely 100% faith in the government's ability to prosecute people for crimes, without the possibility that mistakes are made [/QUOTE]Whereas Snay has absolutely 100% faith that all the people who are killed in abortion are going to grow up to be Dictators. [QUOTE]They generally favor less appeals process in the death penalty cases [/QUOTE]We favor less for yours, you favor none for ours. Who's more draconian? And we can guarantee that 100% of your victims are innocent. [QUOTE]They can't touch your GUN, but they can touch your body, huh? [/QUOTE]Oh, that's rich. You'll allow a death to protect a woman's right to her body... but only AFTER she's been raped. God forbid we should actually let her kill the rapist rather than the child. You'll allow a woman to kill to protect her body (no matter what she's been doing with it in the meantime), but you won't let a person kill to protect their LIFE. You harp about how a gun's only purpose is to KILL, well what do you think an abortion is intended to do, produce a xylophone? You could only say 'sometimes, abortions save lives...' and the answer is 'yes, and we've established that sometimes guns save lives, too. No point there.' Face it, you're supporting the biggest death-of-the-innocent industry since... since EVER, and you're calling us 'bad' because we support the death of the guilty! There's no intrusiveness here... each of us wants to tell the other who they can and cannot murder. The difference is, your stance is hypocritical, while mine is not. Boiled down: Your stance: You cannot kill the presumed guilty, becuse they might be innocent. But you can kill the innocent, because they're inconvenient. Our stance: You can kill the presumed guilty, because they've been judged guilty by the preponderance of the evidence, as the law sees it. You cannot kill the innocent, because they ARE innocent! A better stance: You can't kill the presumed guilty, unless guilt is positively certain, with no reasonable margin for error. Then you may. You still cannot kill the innocent, because they ARE innocent! [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3