Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Community
»
The Flameboard
»
No Evidence Necessary?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by First of Two: [QB] [QUOTE]Yes, Rob, and the fact that they got to Step 2 speaks VOLUMES about the Bush Administration. [/QUOTE]No it doesn't. You're hysterical. Take some Prozac or something. It speaks volumes less than all the plans hatched to 'get Castro' during every administration since Kennedy. It speaks less than the considered (and rejected) option of using nuclear weapons in Korea and Vietnam. It CERTAINLY speaks less than a certain other organization's recently-reported desire to use a 'dirty nuke' against their enemies. It even speaks less that the once-considered possibility of using mininukes to help build highways. Or the Orion starship, which at least reached the design phase. (Step #3) Or the Zimmermann note. [QUOTE]shut up about what a lousy apartment you have. [/QUOTE]Why? Aren't you (as a loyal leftist) outraged that the inmates at Guantanamo are getting better housing and better medical care than the poor in America? (Granted, I have more space, but there are plenty of homeless folks who would be happy to have 8'x8' to call their own, plus three squares a day (of food made to their liking, no less!), A/C, and MASH-level medical care. On another tack, why doesn't the NYT name a single 'official?' Could it be that they talked to the Assistant Vice Attache in Charge of Duckponds? The title of this thread is appropriate in more than one way. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3