Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Community
»
The Flameboard
»
A challenge: Defend SD.net!
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Boris: [QB] Because the vision is different between the shows. TOS was about believability, believability, research, science-fiction writers. How would a real naval captain behave, that was the question? The movies took the naval, militaristic parallel to an extreme. Early TNG was about this fantasy universe where everything is ideal and the humans have evolved and strive for bettering themselves. Is that the vision of Star Trek? Or is it perhaps the DS9 version, where the former is being mocked by Quark, by O'Brien, sometimes by Sisko? I'm arguing that if people can't see these visions then they aren't looking closely enough. These shows were made with different visions by different executive producers. So, should we make everything as believable as was TOS? Or should we tend towards a mishmash of visions? Or should each show be analyzed independently? Boris [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3