Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Community
»
The Flameboard
»
Libya to surrender WMD weapons, programs
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by TSN: [QB] He is the guy involved in the situation you're thinking of, yes. But there wasn't actually any mention of "mind-control satellites". The questionable part was in the "definitions" section of the bill, which said: <blockquote>(2)(A) The terms `weapon' and `weapons system' mean a device capable of any of the following: ... (ii) Inflicting death or injury on, or damaging or destroying, a person (or the biological life, bodily health, mental health, or physical and economic well-being of a person)-- ... (II) through the use of land-based, sea-based, or space-based systems using radiation, electromagnetic, psychotronic, sonic, laser, or other energies directed at individual persons or targeted populations for the purpose of information war, mood management, or mind control of such persons or populations;</blockquote> So, yes, mind control is mentioned, but in the context of "land-based, sea based, or space-based systems". So, "mind control" isn't necessarily associated with the "space-based" part of it. [URL=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.2977.IH:]Here[/URL] is the original text of the bill, and [URL=http://thomas.loc.gov/cgi-bin/query/z?c107:H.R.3616.IH:]here[/URL] is the rewritten text. I think the problem with the original seems to be that they were a bit too wordy about defining what a "weapon" is, and ended up trailing off into unrelated territory. After all, what do land- and sea-based weapons have to do with a bill to outlaw space weapons? And just what the hell [i]is[/i] a "chemtrail", anyway? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3