Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Community
»
The Flameboard
»
ClimateGate
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jason Abbadon: [QB] None of your amusing linked articles are written by, you know, scientists. People with science degrees. Qualified skeptics, in other words. But here's one for you to read: [URL=http://www.copenhagendiagnosis.org/press.html]The Copenhagen Diagnosis[/URL] It stipulates that: [b]-Both the Greenland and Antarctic ice sheets are losing mass and contributing to sea-level rise at an increasing rate. -The area of summer sea ice remaining during 2007-2009 was about 40% less than the average projection from the 2007 IPCC Fourth Assessment Report. -Global sea-level rise may exceed 1 meter by 2100. Without significant mitigation, sea-level rise of several meters is to be expected over the next few centuries. -If long-term global warming is to be limited to a maximum of 2°Celsius above preindustrial values, average annual per-capita emissions in industrialized nations will have to be reduced by around 80-95% below 1990 levels by 2050. [/b] But dont take [i]my[/i] word for it- take [b][i]these[/i][/b] guy's word: [b]-Professor Stefan Rahmstorf, Professor of Physics of the Oceans and a Department Head at the Potsdam Institute for Climate Impact Research in Germany. -Professor Richard Somerville, Scripps Institution of Oceanography, University of California, San Diego, USA. -Professor Corinne Le Quéré, Professor of Environmental Science at the University of East Anglia, and researcher at the British Antarctic Survey, UK.[/b] These scientists wrote that report and have noting to do with any suspect e-mails. Maybe you could link in a counter-argument made by someone with credintials? If nothing else should make you reconsider your position it's that sarah palin agrees with you: [QUOTE] (CNN)– In a late night posting on her Twitter feed, Former Alaska Gov. Sarah Palin continued to blast climate change believers Friday, calling the talks in Copenhagen, Denmark a representation of man's "arrogance," for believing people have an impact on nature. "Arrogant&Naive2say man overpwers nature," Palin tweeted. "Earth saw clmate chnge4 ions;will cont 2 c chnges.R duty2responsbly devlop resorces4humankind/not pollute&destroy;but cant alter naturl chng," the former Republican vice presidential nominee wrote. Palin's latest comments come after weeks of tangling over climate change with California Gov. Arnold Schwarzenegger, former vice president Al Gore, and President Obama. In an op-ed in the Washington Post, Palin urged the president to boycott the climate talks, calling his presence at the conference a "political move." "The last thing America needs is misguided legislation that will raise taxes and cost jobs – particularly when the push for such legislation rests on agenda-driven science," Palin wrote. "Without trustworthy science and with so much at stake, Americans should be wary about what comes out of this politicized conference. The president should boycott Copenhagen." When Schwarzenegger questioned Palin's stance on climate change, Palin quickly hit back saying the actor-turned-governor was acting "greener than thou." And when former vice president Al Gore dubbed her a climate change "denier," Palin hit back at him too, accusing him of promoting "doomsday scenarios." "Climate change is like gravity – a naturally occurring phenomenon that existed long before, and will exist long after, any governmental attempts to affect it," Palin wrote on her Facebook page. During the vice presidential debate last year, Palin said she was for capping carbon emissions but did not elaborate on how she would do that. [/QUOTE]She's a fucking[i] idiot[/i]. ;) [URL=http://www.huffingtonpost.com/2009/12/02/climategate-the-7-biggest_n_371223.html]Huffington Post[/URL] has a nice article on the dubious claims of "hoax" regarding climate change. Not that I expect you to actually read it- your mind was made up for you already it seems. Here is an [URL=http://solveclimate.com/blog/20090806/climate-deception-revisited-whats-behind-signatures-31-478-skeptical-scientists]excellent article [/URL] debunking some of the climate-related deception that special intrest groups are useing. Now compare that with the cherrypicked e-mails making up your so-called Climategate and you'll see who's really looking to decieve public opinion on the matter. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3