Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Community
»
The Flameboard
»
ClimateGate
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Guardian 2000: [QB] Pensive, I am a little unclear on your post. For one thing, government is not opposed to AGW legislation . . . if anything, the Western governments are stridently in favor of it, both within their borders (hence our coming light bulb ban already made law) and without (hence Copenhagen). As for me, I wish to again point out that it isn't a question of [b]who[/b] is supported. Facts are facts, and it doesn't matter who believes in them, argues for them, or ignores them. Even if the whole world said 2+2=6, it would be irrelevant because it wouldn't be true, and just because the Great Satan Sarah Palin says the sky is blue doesn't make it false. As far as I'm concerned, climatology is far too young a science to base "billions and trillions" on, especially considering that thirty years ago they were claiming the very opposite thing as now. Add that the leading proponents are lying scoundrels trying to hide well-known facts like the MWP, and frankly I think we should just take a decade or two and see how things settle out, with the government staying the hell out of it for the time being. After all, publication in peer review journals is the beginning of science, not the end, no matter what the AGW guys think. And in any case, environmentalists already have corporations, the media, and so on, so people would happily buy "green" crap now. I think most of it is more dangerous than helpful, but oh well. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3