Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
The attitude about CGI
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by RAMA: [QB] I've noticed that there are still a handful of people on various boards who make a point of being down on the extensive use of CGI in movies and TV these days. I tend to be pro-CGI because of comparisons that can be made with earlier SF, and the limitations on HOW ships and scenes were shot. Compare a murky, traditional FX shot from Battlestar Galactica that could very well also be a stock shot, to the static FX of early STNG, to the plastic toy look of B5..and the nearly seamless CGI and expansive shot list of Enteprise..easily the best FX ever seen on a regular TV show in history. Minority Report didn't really emphasize its FX, but they were probably the best I've ever seen in a SF movie AND they were also wonderfully integrated. CGI still has its flaws, there is no doubt of it. One day Geroge Lucas will look back on the early stages of CGI and re-release a director's cut of Episode II. Sometimes the human motion is still off(as in Spiderman), and entire scenes or backgrounds can almost appear to lack life..or that's the best way I can describe it. Still as an advancing technology, I would hope the critics would give it more of a chance. RAMA [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3