Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
(No $$) Nemesis has tanked...
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by AndrewR: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by PsyLiam: [qb] "Ridiculous". To try and be reasonable here, how do you know that waiting would be better? Perhaps Stewart and Spiner might not have wanted to do a Trek movie in 2004? Maybe not. > Maybe X-Men 2 will be out in 2004? Set for this year. >Maybe they'll release The Hobbit. I wish - Peter Jackson has said 'no way' - yeah someone else could do it but - I don't think they'd have the rights. >Maybe Lucus will be early. Yeah right. Have you watched any of those TPM/AotC making ofs of the DVDs? Maybe there will be another amazing super smash film. That's a risk they should take, but they already KNEW going into the movie what was going to be out there at the time - and what would have already been on that year already. Star Wars, X-men, LotR, Spiderman, Harry Potter. It's what is wrong with Trek on TV now - the market is saturated. During TNG's day - the market was a barren wasteland and TNG was an oasis. Look at what has been pumped out since TNG finished in '94. >I can understand delaying a few weeks, or even >months to avoid going up against something huge, >but two years? A bit overkill, don't you think? No, otherwise I wouldn't have posted it. :) I see what you mean - but this is more in the realm of 'We need to make a Trek every few years'. Why? To give Gates McFadden and Michael Dorn a few minutes of screen time? I don't think so. I read infact, that the cast doesn't have to work again - ever - cause they get such good residuals from TNG. [/qb][/QUOTE] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3