Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
Wow! Is that /her/?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Guardian 2000: [QB] Hmm . . . I was firmly entrenched in the "No way, Jose" camp, but upon careful review I'm not so sure. The jawline of the hair pic is wrong . . . JL was not jowly, but certainly didn't have a chiseled chin arcing down like lightning from a chiseled jaw. The eyes of the hair pic are wrong. The hair pic girl has eyes whose outer points are at least level with the inner points, if not drooping altogether. JL's outer eye points are significantly higher . . . far too much to allow any sort of angle change to account for it. That having been said, it's possible that advanced eye makeup technology plus bad lighting could produce that effect, but I rather doubt it. The little lines going from the outer nostril region downward and outward toward the mouth are wrong. The hair pic girl's little lines aren't really lines at all, but such as they exist they are on a straight shot to the corners of the mouth. JL's, on the other hand, take a more gentle course, giving room for the delightful corners of her lips, with their graceful, playful curving . . . oh, right, sorry. Measurement doesn't work. The two left-hand pictures in Dracon's JL.jpg, despite the hairline similarities, also show a differing forehead height. Measuring from center hairline to chin (with stops at the line of the inner eye points, nose, center-of-lips (i.e. opening), and then chin), we have the following distances: (hairline-eye, eye-nose, nose-lip, lip-chin = hairline=chin) 65, 25, 26, 33 = 149 45, 22, 19, 25 = 111 Note the ratio of hairline-eye to the total . . . in the first case, it's 65 to 149, or 0.436. In the middle pic, that's 45 to 111, or 0.405. The ratio of eye-nose to total is also off. Hair pic girl rates 0.1677, while JL gets 0.198. Then there's eye spacing compared to the total. In the hair girl pic, the eyes are 25px apart for a face of 149px total length. In the JL pic, the eyes are 23px apart for a face of 111px total length. That translates into 0.1677 and 0.207, respectively. Even if the length of the face and its pieces-parts were highly variable based on angle and lighting and age and whatnot, I do not see how her eyes could've gotten so much closer together for the hair pic. Last but not least, there's the upper nose area between the eyes. In the JL pics, if you trail your way up the nose (ew) you can see how her nose reaches its thinnest point just below her eyes, then starts to spread out again, carrying us right along to the eyebrows. The hair pic girl, on the other hand, has a nose which is not so graceful . . . hers just sort of collides with the forehead, the thinnest point being very high between the eyes, with a hasty expansion above that. I suppose that this could, somehow, be a trick of light, shadow, and make-up, but I don't really see how based on this cursory examination. It is my opinion that the two parties are not one and the same, or that, if they are, the photographer and lighting director of the hair girl pic should be beaten. The primary evidence is the width of the eyes . . . even plastic surgery can't change that, so far as I know. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3