Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
Bernd: Your inconsistencies section..
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Peregrinus: [QB] The [i]Enterprise[/i] seemed to be acting in a very flagshippy manner up until Generations. [i]Voyager[/i] started out by going into a nasty region of local space to try and dig out Federation renegades who didn't want to be dug out, and then spent the next seven years on their own and constantly getting the stuffing whacked out of them. I don't find it odd that some higher-profile ships maintained a certain formality while others are entirely shirtsleeve. My closest friend at the last base I lived on was an EMT for the on-base hospital. In the two years I was there, I never saw him on duty in anything other than his BDUs. I also find it entirely likely that the "fatigues" weren't considered a viable alternative duty uniform until the TNG scrubs gave way to the DS9 style. Nor do I find any problem with Starfleet going through a war and its aftermath in their "get dirty" uniforms. I didn't see a whole lot of class A's in Desert Storm. In one of my odd moments of inspiration while I was rewriting the Nemesis script, I drafted a brief scene in Picard's quarters where he's putting away his dress uniform jacket, pauses at his old class A jacket, sighs, and says "I'm looking forward to being able to pull this out again...". --Jonah P.S. I'd like to apologize for going of of faulty info above. The [i]Excelsior[/i] Navigator was a grey-shirted Commander, not a white-shirted Lieutenant. Someone mixed up the actors from Star Trek VI and "Flashback" in the only sites where I could find pics. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3