Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
Bernd: Your inconsistencies section..
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [QB] The two non-conflict versions vis-a-vis Decker's command here seem to be: A) -Capt Kirk commands until 2270, relinquishes the ship to Starfleet, gets a desk job. -Capt (or perhaps still Cmdr) Decker gets command in 2270, oversees 2.5 years of Enterprise operations which include 18 months of refitting *and an unspecified year of something else*. -Adm Kirk takes over, demotes and kicks out Decker in 2273. B) -Kirk commands until 2270, drops the E to Starfleet and gets a desk job. Ship either has no commanding officer for a year, or has some no-name commanding, or possibly has Scotty commanding. Or then Kirk commands, but doesn't get any "star hours" since the ship is dormant. -Capt/Cmdr Decker gets the ship in 2271, oversees 18 months of refitting but nothing else. -Kirk takes over again in 2273. Whether there is any point in arguing which of these took place is another matter. The original question was about this, though, wasn't it? There is no conflict in any case, but there is ambiguity. The third possible variant is the one where much more than 2.5 years transpire between TOS and TMP. Add a second five-year mission, or some other adventures, as you please. Also, I stand corrected on the E-D flagship status. We have to think of another excuse for the dress-down Friday. Timo Saloniemi [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3