Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
Crazy-ass RUMOR about a prequel trilogy
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mucus: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by TSN: [QB] <blockquote>"...RHW didn't have that great a showing with Andromeda...."</blockquote> I don't know about that. The show wouldn't have been so bad if Sorbo hadn't crushed the life out of it. [/QUOTE]Possibly, I'll grant you that. But, even in the pilot when the Sorbo influence wasn't as strong, there were still some pretty childish elements. I gave it a chance up till pretty much of the end of the second season, but I really didn't ever see anything that made me go "Wow, thats good science fiction. That really makes me think." Let's just say I'm doubtful, and leave it at that. Jason: Missing the point. With a couple of drinks, you *may* be able to convince me that Enterprise *might* the shinest piece of crap in the big pile of science fiction crap on TV right now....but...you know how it goes. Also, I'll gladly agree to the fact that there was a lot of crap produced in the 80s, but so what? Also, Fifth Element? Who mentioned Fifth Element? Long live the strawman. None of this remotely touches on the quality of Star Trek, and the assertion that we wouldn't watch it if we weren't previously committed. Especially because you know....there's more to life than watching science fiction on TV. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3