Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
TNG remastered
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Reverend: [QB] [QUOTE]I also think that the Cheyenne class would have been a bad idea, if only because now we'd have to start calling it a Pegasus-class ship instead of a Cheyenne. [/QUOTE]I can think of at least six ways around that one. The most obvious being that there were say 2 or 3 Cheyennes in the prototype phase and the Pegasus was only the 2nd or 3rd one built for the GCS system trials. By the time the trials were over and the class went into production as a ship in it's own right the class was named for the first of the prototypes...or using the name Cheyenne was a part of the political hush-up of the Pegasus incident. I think using the Cheyenne would be a fine choice, certainly better than the Oberth. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3