Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
The $poiler-$trewn $tar Trek Movie Rumour Di$cu$$ion Thread (Did I mention $poiler$?)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Pensive's Wetness: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Daniel Butler: [qb] I like it too but it's not right for the E-nil at all. It looks nothing like 'contemporary' designs. [/qb][/QUOTE]I, too like the visuals seen. it's clear of the path seen that it follow ENT more and more (think about it: When we saw the Defiant in IAMD, we saw the TOS set-up with modern visuals, like it would have been in the 60's had such SFx's existed back then. some folks wondered why the tech declined from the era of ENT/Mirror ENT to TOS-Sorta-R. what if the defiant, hell the whole Clean-JF style trek ships existed in but one reality and ENT/Mirror-ENT entrially another? between ST:FC and the space-vampires in Space battleship yamato/Star Blaz... , err, ENT, i'm fairly certain the space time continum is well worn like a Thia hooker on Nickle night...) *breaths* anyway, NuTOS is clearly following ENT's tech line of advancement. does that mean that our beloved ships once they cross the NuTMP line will look different in the future? who knows? we'll know next month. and just because i love to pee in the soup, with all those beer cans tossed in, with the Kelvin's hull number of 0514, and seemingly a single nacelle ship, does that make it a [i]Saladin[/i] class? a homage to JF's beloved and GR derided rules be fucked? or is that [i]0[/i] A legal reason to affront the JF estate once more? anybody with legal ears taking note of activity that way? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3