Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
General Trek
»
Enterprise is UNORIGINAL
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Vogon Poet: [QB] Personally, I don't have any issue with the show having transporters. They're part of Star Trek lore, and I see no evidence to suggest that they couldn't have had them in 2151. As for the original impetus for having them on TOS, budget, that remains an issue, but there's also time constraints. Ever see [i]Crusade[/i]? That often featured long scenes set on a shuttle going to or from a planet's surface, and it slowed the action up considerably. Added to that, it wasn't the same set they used for the shuttles in B5, and looked cheaper. Of course, the E-D was originally going to have transporters on the Bridge, but changed it so that time could be taken for character interaction/plot exposition while they went to the transporter room. Then you had DS9 where they did have transporters in Ops. It's give and take. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3