Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
LUG Ships
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bernd: [QB] IC: I'm sorry if you get the impression you have to defend yourself or the LUG book. I think those who don't like the LUG designs are just glad they are not canon and *need not* be included in an official ship list. On the other hand, you do present them on your website and you have arguments for it. We seem to have different ideas about it, what's wrong about it? You must take into account there can be objections. I only have to mention words like "BoP", "Defiant" or "Niagara", and there will be a fierce discussion about it [IMG]http://solareclipse.net/Forums/wink.gif[/IMG] What I tried to suggest is that the people at the forum could put their talents together and conceive some consistent designs for the ships in question. No one demands you have to remove the LUG ships from your site. Suum cuique (hard to translate, sorry). "What are we doing here? You seem to be restating my philosphy of Trek being a subjective experience with everyone being able to define their own 'canon'." I think we don't have to state this explicitly, since we are arguing like this the whole time. If I look back upward in this thread, our discussion seems to date back to an initial misunderstanding. This was when you said you "would use" certain ships and you meant the RPG, and I replied "we are not supposed to use" the ships and I meant a personal ship list or ship designs developed in the forum. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3