Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Role of Kitbashed Ships in Starfleet
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Aban Rune: [QB] I think that Timo's ideas are good for the most part (as always). I don't neccessarily mind the idea of having a ship thrown together for a single action then evacuated before she got blown up. But the Shelley class we saw (the U.S.S. Curry) was in operation and traveling with a fleet. The Constitution parts are not in scale with the Excelsior parts therefore something had to be custom made. Same with the Centaur. I think that for this reason, the Centaur type, the Shelley Class, and the Yeager class are all designed classes, not thrown together. Also, the Miranda and Cnstellation classes are hardly kitbashes. Even the models have custom built saucers. The designers of those classes were simply going for a generational feel and I think they did a darn nice job. It is certainly reasonable to think that there are ships out there that have similar feels to them regarding the Excelsior class and the Ambassador and others. These would not be kitbashes though just because they share some design components. Prakesh: It's been stated in several sources that high capacity replication like that isn't possible. Certainly many of the parts are replicated and assembled. But they can't just replicate an entire ship. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3