Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Could Constitutions have more torpedo launchers?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ultra Magnus: [QB] <blockquote>Miranda/Avenger class starships </blockquote> Well, just the canon [i]'Miranda'[/i], and not the nonsensical 'Avenger' would suffice. <blockquote>They are classified as frigates</blockquote> IIRC, [i]Miranda[/i]s have been reffered to as a few different things. <blockquote>considering the extensive and inefficient layout of PTC's</blockquote> PTC? <blockquote>are less readily adaptable to new engine types.</blockquote> What episode did they mention this in? <blockquote>They are specifically battle minded short-range craft intended for escort and patrol operations. They are the least equipped for scientific missions. </blockquote> Again, what episode? Also, IIRC, we've seen [i]Miranda[/i]s doing everything but buying Feminie Hygiene products for Grandma, so I'd think it hard to pin down the [i]Miranda[/i]s role. <blockquote>The only reasons I think the Constitutions were retired are because: There were so few left that their upkeep costs and frequent need of upgrades to stay ahead of the curve were deemed inefficient use of funding. And the Excelsior class finally made it into full scale production. With a new class of heavy cruisers in production, with even more space, adaptability, firepower (including rear-firing torpedoes), scientific instrumentation, and modern technology, the Constitutions were deemed superfluous.</blockquote> These Ideas = Very good thinking. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3