Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Transwarp Drive?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by PsyLiam: [QB] Read up on warp theory? Do you mean the type proposed by Mr Scott's Guide to the Enterprise (which you are following)? Or the type proposed by the TNG tech manual? Or one of the 50,000 other theories proposed to explain it? BTW, I did reread what you posted. And it [i]still[/i] doesn't make sense. For example: "and yes warp 13 is not faster than warp 10 but it will get you to a further distance quicker." Soooo, you're saying that warp 13 is slower, or the same speed as warp 10. And yet it allows you to reach your destination quicker? Surely that means it's, well, faster? And if it's faster than warp 10, it's faster than infinity? Or, at the very least, the moment the Enterprise went to warp 13, it should have arrived at it's destination. Unless you're proposing that some sort of time-dilation effect came into play, but the TNG manual states (I think) than time-dilation doesn't happen at warp speeds. So, huh? Regarding the recalibration of the warp scale. Thinking about it, the idea that they've gone back to the TOS scale isn't relaly satisfying either. Didn't the old Enterprise manage warp 13 in That Which Survives? Sure it was a couple of seconds away form breaking apart, but it still hit it. Going by that, Warp 13 wouldn't really be very fast for the Ent-D. Especially the future Ent-D. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3