Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Unknown "thing" from TNG "Symbiosis"
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by PsyLiam: [QB] I can't [i]believe[/i] I'm doing this, but... "A superlaser could destroy a Prometheus" The superlaser (what a stunningly original name) could destroy anything. Of course, the original one could only be used on planets, and the second one still required a lengthy charge up time. The Death Star being able to destory a planet was A Big Deal. The Defiant could destroy a planet. There were only two Death Stars. There are potentially [i]loads[/i] of Star Trek ships that could level planets. "SW has made billions more than ST" That's not an argument of quality. The Lost World made more than Jurrasic Park, ir memory serves. Yet it's inferior in almost every way. "George Lucas is all powerful and mighty" Most of the jokes I want to put in would cause small children to scream, but I will ask, don't you think that Lucus is maybe, just maybe, a one hit wonder? "and in my opinion is a better Sci-Fi achievement than ST." George Lucus is a Sci-Fi achievement? What [i]is[/i] a sci-fi achievement? Are we basing this on how many people watch it, or something more? Your previous post also said that the Trek movies wouldn't have been possible without SW. Star Wars likely wouldn't have been possible without the original Trek series. And, for a follow up, incredibly fun <a href="http://www.x-entertainment.com/messages/388.html"> plot oversights from the Phantom Menace</a>. Shock! George Lucus isn't infallible. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3