Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
NCC-1305-E
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by MeGotBeer: [QB] [QUOTE]MeGotBeer, do you also believe in a USS Lollipop, since Riker said such ship exists?[/QUOTE] Since, as is obvious to anyone who has ever seen [i]The Arsenal of Freedom[/i], Riker created a ship out of thin air in a deceit to see if he was actually speaking with his friend Paul Rice, no, I don't believe such a ship exists. [QUOTE]He could have been JOKING and no one thought it was funny[/QUOTE] Are we speaking re: [i]Lolipop[/i] or [i]Yamato[/i]? Givin that they were lost in such an unknown area, and their reactions to another ship, no, it's quite clear to everyone Riker wasn't joking. And if he was, why didn't Worf, Data, or Picard contradict him? [QUOTE]Also, just because YOU believe one registry doesn't make it anymore canon then the other. Like I said, you are far from being in charge of what is canon.[/QUOTE] Ah, but you are? I don't claim to be in charge of canon, I just make a better case for why NCC-1305-E is canon then you do. [QUOTE]You want to believe it's NCC-1305-E, then fine, believe, but don't throw a hissy fit when no one wants to follow your lead.[/QUOTE] I do believe its NCC-1305-E. You're the one throwing the hissy fit. Actually, since I seem to be the only person sticking up for the 1305-E theory, you're a coward, joining in an attack on a lone speaker. Nyah-nyah-nyah. And if you honestly believed in "not throwing hissy fits", you wouldn't have made the above post. [QUOTE]We think it's NCC-71807, so leave it at that.[/QUOTE] Difference is, of course, that you're wrong, and I'm right. :) [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3