Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
NCC-1305-E
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Ryan McReynolds: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by MeGotBeer: [qb]The [i]Yamato's[/i] registry is not contradicted by dialogue. It is contradicted by an Okudagram.[/qb] [/QUOTE] That's right, and you [i]still[/i] haven't explained why dialogue takes priority over Okudagrams. They are [i]both canon[/i], and that is why we must turn to other sources. Not because Okuda is the god of canon, not because we don't want the registry to be NCC-1305-E, and not because we want to be difficult. What makes dialogue more canon than anything else? Unless you can explain this train of thought, the rest of us continue to make the logical assumption that they are equally valid... and I think by now I've established that if they are equally valid, then another source must be consulted. Do you have a [i]reason[/i] for accepting dialogue over anything else? I've already shown the arguement that visual evidence could be more relevant than spoken words because of the inherrent fallibility of people -- solely for explanatory purposes, I might add -- but I have yet to see any justification for the opposite. It [i]seems[/i] as though you prefer dialogue for no reason other than wanting to. If that is the case, you can't possibly be surprised that other people don't follow your standard... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3