Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Transporter continuity *g* - canon evidence
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Bernd: [QB] [QUOTE]When it takes four months for fandom to do their worst to find a continuity error, how the hell can anyone lay any blame on the producers for "missing" this with a straight face?[/QUOTE] I'm not blaming them. I never expected Okuda or anyone else to find obscure evidence pro or contra the use of transporters or any other technology. If they wanted transporters for the new series, they would have made them possible also against canon evidence. First the premise, then the continuity. The will to make the look and feel visually different from what we know, like in the cases of the shuttle launchers and the tractor beam, was not there. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3