Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Any new theories on phasers?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by David Templar: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Shik: [qb] I take issue with this statement. I sincerely do not believe that length of an array makes any difference. Indeed, this concept would then make [i]Sovereign[/i]s & [i]Prometheus[/i] far LESS powerful than a [i]Galaxy[/i] saucer array by sheer dint of being shorter. This has been shown & stated to not be the case. [/qb][/QUOTE] Um, the Sovereign mounts Type-XII phaser emitters, the Galaxy mounts Type-X. Apparently the Type-XII is powerful enough to surpass Type-Xs, even with less emitters involved. Strip size matters, but so does emitter types. [QUOTE][qb] Also, how do you account for "special types" such as the [i]Miranda[/i]-class rollbar unit (the so-called "megaphaser"), the [i]Norway[/i]-class single centerline-mounted emitter, & the [i]Defiant[/i]-class pulse cannons in this theory?[/qb][/QUOTE] I'm pretty sure I mentioned the Defiant. I classify all none phaser strip type emitters as banks, because of [explaination in previous post]. How is the Miranda special from the Constitution or the Excelsior? And I'm not sure about the Norway, doesn't it have the same type of phasers as the Defiant? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3