Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
If you could get Paramount to CGI a model...
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by PsyLiam: [QB] If what, er, someone said about ILM not liking the Ent-D model is true, then they truelly are the hardest people in the world to please. They're notorious for bitching and complaining about the Enterprise-A model for 4 films, saying it was heavy, akward, and they could never find a good angle on it. Compared to the Excelsior and Galaxy, it's a piece of cake to make the Enterprise-A look good. Someone else (sorry, I really can't be bothered looking) was right, it was well proportioned. It became the base proportion whill all subsequent ships tried to model (as, in some ways, we are more familiar with the A than the original. The A was an upgraded version, so it replaced the original, rather than suceeded it. Kind of). The Excelsior tried to look huge by having a massive body. The Galaxy tried to look huge by having a massive saucer. And both aren't too easy to film,although they improved leaps and bounds with Ent-D shots over the course of the series. And on the two models debate, I do prefer the 4 footer, but I wonder if that's because it was simply shot and lit better? What was the CGI model based on? And how comes the 6 footer in that pic has had it's decals taken off, whereas the 4 footer still has them? In any case, shouldn't it have the Venture's decals on it? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3