Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Good news about the DS9 Tech Manual ships!
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Cpt. Kyle Amasov: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Ace: [qb]People who like the NX-59XXX number versus the NX-749XX number state that it's because that number is seen more clearly. However, how many of you state that we should accept USS Brittain instead of Brattain. Brittain was a LOT clearer than Brattain (seen as a little label behind the captain's chair). The name Brittain was seen in several shots. Why do you accept Brattain, then? Because it was an error you say. So why not NX-749XX? As to my belief? I don't really care about that ship. It seems too fanboyish for me, and it shot a Nebula class (yes, I'm strange :p ).[/qb][/QUOTE]And it's not the only one. From small errors (Pasteur, Ahawahnee) to large larger mistakes (Hood bearing Lakota-registry, Jenolan/en/in)) - but everyone should decide which one he accepts. I take the 74xxx because it's from the guys who know how to do it, and it makes a lot more sense. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3