Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Starfleet methods of hiding prototypes
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by CaptainMike: [QB] Alabin, both the Nebula-Melbourne and the Excelsior-Melbourne had the same registry.. thats why its so distasteful to think they were both correctly labeled.. how would two different ships have the same registry and coexist? And Barash did make mistakes in his holosimulation. Riker misremembering a hologram as a real person is a big mistake, as was the hologram of Data being unable to compute a course, so im sure there were other errors creeping in. And yes i know of the flying bomb idea being a real tactic ('fire ships', etc..). Im sure that Starfleet might even have used it a few times. But its a pretty lame explanation, and gets tired when we drag it out every time we see an older ship we didnt expect to see. Sometimes its easier without trying to overexplain it, like just saying 'that ship was what it appeared to be' [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3