Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Rehashing Galaxy Wings
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Mark Nguyen: [QB] Sitak and MAJESTIC, Aban. :) As for the whole wing thing, note that in both "Favor the Bold" and "Sacrifice of Angels" we see small formations of ships in classic arrowhead shape, with a Galaxy at the tip. I'm thinking that this is at least part of what a "Galaxy wing" is. Likewise, I think that they were saying nine-one and nine-two, as in a "section nine, wing one" type of deal. One problem with Trek ships is that they don't necessarily have to be bigger to be better. Sternbach has posited often that ships as small as the Intrepid and Defiant can mount a Type-X phaser, which would therefore match the firepower and range of a Galaxy's primary beam armament. Phaser endurance and rate of fire would likely be factors, however it means that a much smaller ship can have a similar punch at least at the outset as Starfleet's biggest. Mark [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3