Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Centaur Schematics
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Dukhat: [QB] [QUOTE]Definitely like the filming model better.[/QUOTE]TSN's comment aside, the "filming model" was a hastily-built, awfully painted, crappy kitbash that a 10 year old kid could have done a better job building. The CGI model was an extrapolation of the physical model, with attributes making it more believable as a "real" Starfleet vessel. If you like the physical model better, that's your opinion, but I think you're nuts. I happen to really like this CGI model. I think Mojo made some good choices with what liberties he took, and what to ignore & change. And at the least, I appreciate the fact that he did this because of the points we made when we first saw the physical model pics. Hey, I just realized that this post is the exact polar opposite of what my status line says. Ironic... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3