Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
FINALLY!!!
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Dat: [qb] I suggest you delve further into your history. You are listing ships that you say are named after modern ships. An example... Bonhomme Richard... there was an American frigate with that name in the late 18th century. Also, ever heard of the frigate Constellation from that time period as well? [/qb][/QUOTE]I am not ignorant of the fact that there have been long legacies of these names, but I think Gene Roddenberry wanted to convey the Connies as the aircraft carriers of the 23rd century, thus he named them after aircraft carriers of the day. That was the premise I was going for with those particular ships, anyways. [b]Shik[/b]: I fixed the Saratoga reg in the Bellerophon entry. Thanks. :cool: [b]Harry[/b]: Let's not get into this argument again. Is it my shiplist or yours? :p [b]Bernd[/b]: Funny...sort of. :rolleyes: [b]AndrewR[/b] and [b]newark[/b]: I am going by the assumption that they were two different ships, primarily because there was only one survivor of Wolf 359 and IMO that was indeed the Endeavour. Also, because I am considering both studio models and computer displays as canon in this list, there need to be two ships to explain the two different registries. Actually, though, there is really no evidence that the NCC-71620 ship is a Cheyenne-class vessel. I should eliminate that and propose that it was an older vessel recommissioned after the NCC-73620 was destroyed. Everyone else: Thanks for the encouragement. Sorry if there are technical difficulties. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3