Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Registries... again
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Boris: [QB] I think the point of contention is just what a blooper is, which to me is merely that which cannot possibly be rationalized within the context of the show (a boom mike), whereas other people see it as something that was not intended but happened anyway. The latter allows much more room for accepting and rejecting what we see. It theoretically allows a producer to think like this: "Hmm...maybe I couldn't force my views on to Braga, or work hard enough, but if I manipulate the actual audience through the nets, I'll gain the following which allows my work to be perceived in the way I wanted." What if that producer's views were out of spirit of Star Trek? It would be like me accepting Harlan Ellison's "City on the Edge of Forever" in favor of the aired version, or imagining that Jadzia never died. The official canon order is in place to prevent such manipulations, and that's why public fandom creations are illegal anyway. They can hurt the show as much as helping it. If Star Trek is to become a better show, everything must matter, from the details up. The first step is to stop excusing anything but bloopers that cannot possibly exist within the context of the show, as perceived by the mainstream audience uninfluenced by production notes. That's what I want to do, and it's the only approach lacking any creativity, which is why I'm arguing it belongs to this forum. Boris [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3