Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Registries... again
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by CaptainMaxwell: [QB] At least the original Enterprise and the Enterprise-D do not have any other registry. As far as we know there has been no Enterprise before Kirks (except the NX of course). And Garretts Enterprise has been destroyed nearly twenty years before the commission of Picards. With the -A, the case is clear: Yorktown has been renamed to Enterprise-A. With the -B, there is a problem. Ships usually get a name when there keel is laied and this is some time prior thir launch. So when the -B has been launched in 2293 (which was just one year after the Khitomer conference where the -A was still active) her keel has to be laid in 92 or even 91. I'm not sure but I don't think that any Navy on this Planet would have two vessel with the same name at the same time. So the -B has been laid as U.S.S. Notenterprise and got therefore a registry higher than 2000. With the -C, it may be the same as above but I'm not sure. It depends on when the -B has been destroyed or decommissioned. With the -E, it is similar to the -B. Just one year after the destruction of the -D there was a new Enterprise. Not even the Federation could build such a powerful vessel in one year. Because I think most prototypes will be built in pairs, the -E was originally laid as NCC-75001 (when we take 75000 for the Sovereigns registry and the Enterprise as her sister). [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3