Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
It *is* NCC-2010-5
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jason Abbadon: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Sol System: [qb] Er, keep in mind that the ship itself appeared upside down. A backwards registry hardly seems like the worst of its problems. (And, if the ship "really" is oriented that way, than the name, now on the ventral surface, is on the right way.) Personally, I'm not so happy with the idea of there being two almost identical ship classes with the only difference being one faces one way and one the other. But, there you are. [/qb][/QUOTE]I'd say that Sisko had Kira put the Temporal Investigations guy's ship into a holding pattern as long as possible untill they cleaned up the coridors leading from the lower pylon to OPs of tribbles. The silly upside down docking is the result of a protracted flight path and it makes zero difference if it's not oriented with the station due to rotating airlocks. We'll just have to pretend the guy placing the registry was drunk or fighting off posession by jack the ripper's spirit or some damn thing. .....or it was a initiation prank by Red Squad on the T.I. snobs (who really sees the outside of the ship you're in, anyway?) [b]NO WAY do I go for the "two identical ships with one having the bridge on the ventral side theory.[/b] [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3