Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Ship list Nemesis ($) Revealed
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [QB] Let's remember that originally, we hated the idea of a Yeager class because we knew that a Saber class vessel bore the name USS Yeager in "First Contact". Now that we know the registry of the Intrepid-lookalike from DS9 (NCC-65whatever), and also the registry of the Saber class ship (NCC-61whatever), we would probably be best off saying that the Saber ship was lost and the DS9 ship named in her honor. It would still be strange that a new post-"FC" ship would get a 65000-range registry, though. But the DS9 ship could be a Yeager class vessel then, without enraging the people who don't like ships outside an established class to carry the class name. And any pre-"FC" appearance of the DS9 ship could be said to be by a sister ship and not by the Yeager. If we don't accept this "logic", and rather want to keep TNG registries chronological, then we have to accept the simultaneous existence of two Yeagers, one of them possibly but not necessarily of Yeager class. To preserve the strictest possible fanboy criteria (chronological regos, no two ships with the same name, no ships named after an operational class, yet both sets of backstage pics are "for real"), we'd have to say that the name of one of the ships was changed in mid-life. That is, the name of the DS9 ship. Which would be an odd thing to do to a class ship, thus undermining the theory of a Yeager class. Timo Saloniemi [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3