Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Akira Class
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Kazeite: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Mark Nguyen: [qb] As for the runabouts, scaled as they are it is indeed a tight fit around that central column thing... there's maybe a 2-3 meters tops to maneuver, however if you think about how tightly aircraft are handled on carrier decks, that's more than enough space![/qb][/QUOTE]As far as I'm concerned they can be stacked one on another and nothing bad would happen :) But it's not about storage space - you don't just park runabouts in the middle of the hangar bay. When aircrafts are prepared to be catapulted or even placed on the elevators there's usually more empty space around them. Same thing here (I think.) Distances presented there provide very little room for error for pilot (or tractor beam(s) operator) who want's to relocate that runabout. [QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [qb] Somebody (Bernd? Boris Scrbic? Jack Bohn?) already did the Maquis vs. nacelle analysis, and found no size difference between the "Ro variant" from that episode and the "Chakotay variant" from "Caretaker".[/qb][/QUOTE]Wow, I didn't know that... That's great news :) That means there's no size difference between those two types, just remodeled cockpit :) among other things, no doubt, but the actual hull is the same type. Thanks Timo for sharing that :) [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3