Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
T-Negative #27 (Yes, I *found* it!)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The359: [QB] I've always believed in the use of sub-classes within a class, however I would prefer to keep Constitution as the basic general class name, not Starship. And apparently a lot of Constitutions were listed in Star Trek VI (either Operation Retrieve or the Ship Status Chart). If I remember correctly, some of them were the ones with 16xx registries, so it'd be hard to adapt the FJ registries. Really, I have no problem with the way the registries are now. If we move Eagle and Endeavour to their new numbers, then the registries are more closely grouped together, except Constellation and Republic, and we can explain those two off. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3