Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
T-Negative #27 (Yes, I *found* it!)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Cpt. Kyle Amasov: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Akira: [qb] I have a simple way of looking at this All the Ships were Starship Class untill the new connie class came into play and thus renamed Constitution class See im a mad man :D [/qb][/QUOTE]Ack. So this does either mean that there has been a "USS Starship" or that the Constitution has to be something absolutely new and brilliant that they decide to change their whole nameing/class pattern. :rolleyes: The Enterprise is NX-01. First ship of the NX-class. The Enterprise is NCC-1701. 1701st ship of Starfleet or 1st ship of the 17th class of starfleet vessels or 2nd ship of a new class of starfleet vessels that started its registry run with 1700. Those are the two known registry patterns. But maybe there was a third one, prior to the second, known system, in the time between the founding of Federation's Starfleet and TOS. Maybe it's even one of the versions of the second pattern (since to this day we still haven't been able or willing to pick one of them). At some point it was decided (maybe when SF grew too large) that they needed a "logical" (logical in "'s because we all know that it is far from logical, but Starfleet probably wasn't aware of that ;) ) new system and invented what we know today. There could have been another change in the registry system between TOS and the 24th century. From all we know, allthough Okuda says otherwise, TOS and TNG registry systems do not work the same way. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3