Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
T-Negative #27 (Yes, I *found* it!)
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Phoenix: [qb] With regard to the Starship = Constitution theory, I am pretty sure that Archer calls himself Captain Archer of the Starship Enterprise, at least 100 years before TOS, which would suggest that (regardless of the original intentions of the writers) Starship does not mean Constitution Class. [/qb][/QUOTE]Speaking in "real" Trek terms, you're correct. But generally the issue in question in our discussions on this particular subject is whether these ships were [i]intended[/i] to be Connies originally or not. So the fact that "Starship" was synonymous with "vessel of the [i]Enterprise[/i]'s design" then becomes a significant identifier. -[b]MMoM[/b] :D [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3