Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
DS9 Season 2
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [QB] The Enterprise-B variant is easy to identify from top view, since the additional boxes (engines/shuttlebays/whatever) on the saucer are so prominent. The Challenger line-up sounds like a good idea - "Challenger" would be a fitting name indeed for mankind's second warp experiment, after the Phoenix! The only minus is that the chart in that case just yells for USS Challenger of Challenger class... If we want to start from the list of known Constitution class ships, and then assume that they had successors in all the same classes as the Enterprise did, then the following options are available: [b]Constitution[/b] (a bit dubious, since the name was used as a class name once, and would confuse people if reused) [b]Defiant[/b] (the Defiant class wouldn't yet be present on that chart) [b]Essex[/b] [b]Exeter[/b] (the ship mentioned in 2374 would then be a Galaxy and not the supposed alt-universe Ambassador) [b]Excalibur[/b] [b]Kongo[/b] [b]Potemkin[/b] (again, the ship from 2374 would be the Galaxy, not the Excelsior) [b]Republic[/b] (although if an "old" vessel still serves the Academy in 2375, then the existence of a Galaxy is dubious) [b]Yorktown[/b] The other Constitution names have been applied to ship classes not in that line-up. And the Enterprise herself has another strike going against her: she has a verified NX-class incarnation! Timo Saloniemi [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3