Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
New shiplist format preview
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by newark: [QB] Adding to the argument against a Constellation being in the operation to retake DS9, there are the pages of starships at the end of the DS9 manual which show the classes of starships used. These include the: Akira, Defiant, Excelsior, Galaxy, Miranda, Norway, Saber, Steamrunner, and the kitbashes. So, that is two sources which don't show the Constellation Class in use for the retaking of DS9. I am very hesitant to accept visual data. If I did as some are doing, I would have to accept the following: Ships bearing the registry of previous vessels. The first example I know of this is the USS Hood, an Excelsior Class starship which cerried the registry of NX-2000. Ships whose class is wrong and yet must be right. Can we say USS Potemkin? Ships dying a similiar fate twice or more times. The USS Majestic was destroyed twice. [b]NAR-[/b] As I was compiling my list, I noticed a pattern in the three ships which bear this registry prefix and are registered with the UFP. These three ships are: (1.) Civilian operated (2.) Bear the markings of Starfleet ships I think the registry prefix NAR- is used to denote Starfleet ships which have been shipped to the surplus fleet for re-sale. Once re-sold, the ships are given new names and registries. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3