Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
New shiplist format preview
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Griffworks: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by newark: [b]>SNIKT!<[/b] I am unclear if CV-65 mentioned in an article in Star Trek: The Magazine was a registry. Thus, it was not included.[/QUOTE]That seems to be a "bastardized" version of the registry for the contemporary USN nuclear powered aircraft carrier [i]Enterprise[/i]. The appropriate registry should be CVN-65, tho. [QUOTE]I noted some registries which were mistakenly used for other ships. I am wondering if after correction if these registries are legitimate. For instance, the USS Grissom of "Hollow Toys" was given a registry of NCC-59314. This was later corrected. However, was the registry NCC-59314 still valid for an Oberth Class starship?[/QUOTE]Do you know why it was changed? And "corrected" why, exactly? [QUOTE]Do you think the same applies for NCC-1831 for a Constitution Class starship, NCC-1937 for a Miranda Class starship, and NCC-10523 for a Renaissance Class starship.[/QUOTE]I don't think I understand what you're getting at here. Were there other ships w/those registries that were later changed? Can you give better defined answers, please? I'm totally confused by what you're asking here.... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3