Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Was the Oberth class "really" supposed to be the Grissom-type ship?
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by MrNeutron: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Jason Abbadon: [qb] Ohhhh....is the drawing detailed enough for me to build a physical model of? That would rock....I'd even build one you could give to him! [/qb][/QUOTE]No, the drawing Andy sent isn't very detailed. He said he did do a more detailed elevation of the Ambassador class that was used to make the model for the Observation Lounge, and must've been the basis for his painting. This drawing, which I'm assuming is mid-1987 vintage lists the ship lengths as: U.S.S. Galaxy (2,108' O.L.) [O.L. = Overall Length] U.S.S. Ambassador (1,721' O.L.) U.S.S. Excelsior (1,531' O.L.) U.S.S. Enterprise (1,000' O.L.) [refit] FSV Grissom (395' O.L.) [FSV=Federation Science Vessel] Bird of Prey (360' O.L.) U.S.S. Reliant (765' O.L.) That was his understanding of the vessel sizes when TNG first started. So, keping this on topic, is 395' about what the Oberth class is assumed to be, or has it upsized like the BOP? [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3