Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
The Armada
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [QB] I'm not sure if I agree with that list... Challenger is made of two E-D top halves, so it should have TWO shuttlebays. Medusa is made of Excelsior and E-B top halves, so it has those E-B shuttlebayish thingamabobs. Centaur has the Excelsior shuttlebay part, which may or may not be a shuttlebay (I believe it's a deflector, but that's only because I believe in the "small ship" interpretation of the Centaur). And the Saber has the pronounced frontal openings that are big enough to be Steamrunner-style shuttlebays unless we take the Saber to be 170 meters long. She's far more likely to be 300 or even 400 meters long, if we count the window rows... Not that every ship would *have* to have a shuttlebay. I'm quite happy with the idea that the Norway had none, for example. But adding bays to the Yeager should be simple enough. Note how the Maquis ship hull has several vertical surfaces with distinctively colored rectangular greeblies on them? The ones in the aft corners could quite well be doors to Miranda-style shuttlebays! (As an aside, where do you put landing pads in a Medusa? No matter which way you turn it, there's always a nacelle or two in the way of a clean landing! :confused: :confused: :confused: ) Timo Saloniemi [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3