Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
The Armada
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jason Abbadon: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Peregrinus: [qb] Regarding that last bit -- I don't think you're looking at the same thing, Jason. The [i]Excelsior[/i]'s aft shuttle/cargo bay piece has been brought forward to this end of the secondary hull, yes, but down in the deflector cove, the dish is still there prominently dishlike (but unlit). I see nothing [i]Enterprise[/i]-shuttlebay-y about it. --Jonah [/qb][/QUOTE]Jack the brightness on you monitor to maximum and it looks like theres definitely something in there (not the deflector). I'm of the opinion that it's the clamshell shuttlebay from a constiution model thats been cut to size and inserted there. The kitbashers were using the 1:1000th Excelsior and the 537th Connie Refit for the Curry/Raging Queen bashes and that part of the connie model kit can fit into the deflector area without any difficulty. Just my own theory, but the pic looks like it supports it. ;) Here's the real question I have: Does the Curry have a scond Excelsior shuttlebay at the rear? That would support the whle "through deck carrier" idea at least. All the schematics I've seen online of the ship either have it or dont, but I've found no studio model topview to definitely know. :confused: [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3