Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Refs needed for top of Excelsior suacer
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by machf: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by Timo: [qb] Is that 2541 even genuine? What's the deal with the "cursor pass highlighting"? Who's the resident katakana expert? This could explain the 2544 rego of the next close-upped TNG Excelsior, the Repulse (or her close-upped shuttle), of course... Since 2544 is solid canon, 2541 works just fine for me, too (even though it steps on Belknap toes...). And didn't we have some confusion about a 42296 close-up with the wrong name in DS9? Timo Saloniemi [/qb][/QUOTE]The picture certainly looks like someone erased the registry number. Besides, both Hood and Repulse were named after British battlecruisers. If there were a Renown, it would complete the trio. Where does 42296 come from: aired material, photographic evidence, or something reported by Okuda? I'd consider the priorities in that oreder... [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3