Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Baton Rouge Class
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by The Mighty Monkey of Mim: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by MarianLH: [qb] Give it up, Woody. These guys must ram the canonicity of ENT down everyone's throat, chapter and verse. You're not allowed to have a different view here.[/qb][/QUOTE]Ugh. We simply try to point out (whether gently or not) that fans' own subjective conceptions of 'Star trek history' based on only four or five of the SIX television series, or on books, or on any other kind of incomplete or faulty evidence, are NOT 'Star Trek history.' Psyliam is quite correct in asking for proof of our friend's statement. And there is none. NOWHERE is it established, even prior to ENT, that there were ONLY three pre-TOS [i]Enterprise[/i]s. Never did anyone state this, never was it even included in a computer display graphic. We only ever saw mention of three, but if your reasoning is then that if we don't see/hear about it then it doesn't exist, then Uhura had no mother or father and neither did Chekov or Sulu, even though Kirk and Spock did. Also, no one in the 23rd-24th centuries uses the bathroom. And James Dean was never an actor. Blah blah blah blah... If you want to change 'Star Trek history' to fit your own preferences, go get hired at Paramount and become executive producer of whatever Trek series happens to be running at the time. Then have a blast. Otherwise, quit yer bitchin' and get with the program. (That program being ENT, of course. ;) ) -[b]MMoM[/b] :D [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3