Post A Reply
my profile
|
directory
login
|
search
|
faq
|
forum home
»
Flare Sci-Fi Forums
»
Star Trek
»
Starships & Technology
»
Starfleet Weapons Developments 2380+
» Post A Reply
Post A Reply
Login Name:
Password:
Message:
HTML is enabled.
UBB Code™ is enabled.
[QUOTE]Originally posted by Jason Abbadon: [QB] [QUOTE]Originally posted by WizArtist II: [qb] I always wondered why Genesis had never been studied as a true weapon. All that power in one man sized shell? [/QUOTE][/qb] The ladies say that about me all the time... [QUOTE][qb] Also, why aren't transporters used as weapons. you could make a solid rock materialize inside an enemies injectors and plug up there warp core or such. Or just dematerialize the hatch to the bridge and instantly decapitate the ship. [/qb][/QUOTE]I brought this up some time ago in another thread. While the federation and Klingons would not use transporters as weapons for reasons of morality and honor, pricks like the Romulans would likely concentrate their technology on quickly dismantling an opponent's shields, then just beaming the crew into space (or their ship's replicator's stores for protien). I think weapons using subspace as a medium could be made (like the Dominion's "hoodini" mines) that could penetrate a ship's shields and hull before materializing and detonating. Of course, there's always the possibility of converting a target to antimatter: probably not too difficult for races that have transporter and replicator technology down pat. [/QB][/QUOTE]
Instant Graemlins
Instant UBB Code™
What is UBB Code™?
Options
Disable Graemlins in this post.
*** Click here to review this topic. ***
© 1999-2024 Charles Capps
Powered by UBB.classic™ 6.7.3